Mortgage
Sales Assessment Results

49
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
December 21, 2024
Let's get real here. Your average score of 4.9 shows you’ve got some foundational skills, but you’re playing it too safe and it’s costing you sales. You’ve demonstrated strengths in acknowledging concerns and showing enthusiasm, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. You need to dig deeper. There’s a consistent pattern of lacking depth in your responses—you're acknowledging objections but failing to explore them fully or provide tailored solutions. It’s like you’re just skating on the surface when you need to plunge into the depths of your prospects’ needs. To elevate your game, I suggest you dive into the SPIN Selling and Solution Selling techniques. SPIN will help you ask those probing questions that get to the heart of your prospects' concerns, while Solution Selling will guide you in crafting personalized solutions that resonate with their unique situations. Here’s your coaching moment: remember that every objection is an invitation to engage. Don’t just acknowledge a concern—embrace it, explore it, and turn it into an opportunity for deeper connection. If you make this shift, you’ll not only improve your scores but also build stronger relationships and close more deals. Now get out there and start digging deeper!

Question Breakdown

1.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I'm not sure this mortgage is the best fit for my current budget; can you help with that?"
Answer:
Absolutely let me show you a couple of options so you can choose the best mortgage for your budget
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern regarding their budget, which is a good start. However, it lacks depth in addressing the objection. Instead of just offering options, the salesperson could benefit from asking more probing questions to understand the specific budget constraints and needs of the prospect. This would demonstrate active listening and a solution-focused approach. Additionally, providing some immediate insights or examples related to how the options can fit within their budget could enhance the value exploration. Overall, while the intention is positive, the response feels a bit too generic and doesn't fully engage the prospect in a collaborative dialogue. Score: 5/10 for acknowledging the concern but lacking a deeper engagement and exploration of the prospect's specific needs.
2.
6
/ 10
Question:
"I have seen more competitive rates elsewhere, what makes your offer stand out?"
Answer:
Rates are important with the absence of value. If you want quality in your rate from an honest mortgage professional, that’s not gonna steer you wrong and walk you through to the closing table. I am your girl. Trust me, let’s get this loan closed so that you can move into your dream home
Feedback:
The response addresses the concern about competitive rates by highlighting the importance of value and quality service, which is a good approach. However, it lacks specific details about what unique value your offer brings beyond simply being an 'honest mortgage professional.' It would have been stronger to include specific benefits, such as personalized service, faster closing times, or additional resources that set you apart. The tone is friendly and encouraging, which is appropriate for the mortgage industry. However, it could benefit from a more structured closing technique, perhaps summarizing the key points before urging the prospect to move forward. Overall, while the response shows enthusiasm and a willingness to help, it needs more clarity and specific value differentiation.
3.
6
/ 10
Question:
"I really need to focus on my kids' education expenses right now; I'm not sure I can afford this mortgage."
Answer:
I totally understand looking at your budget. This mortgage is going to be at least $500 cheaper than your current rent. As you know paying rent is 100% interest at least this home you’re gonna be building equity so that you can cash out and pay for your children’s education expenses.
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern about education expenses, which is a good start in terms of active listening. However, it could have delved deeper into the emotional aspect by exploring the importance of education and how homeownership can actually contribute to long-term financial stability and savings for that purpose. The tone is somewhat transactional, focusing on the financial aspect but lacking a more empathetic approach. It effectively communicates potential savings but could benefit from asking open-ended questions about their specific concerns and goals, addressing the need for a more collaborative approach. A closing technique could also be employed to guide the conversation toward a decision. Overall, while the response has some strong points, it lacks depth in exploring the prospect's feelings and motivations. Score: 6
4.
6
/ 10
Question:
"What kind of customer support can I expect after closing?"
Answer:
You can rest assured that our customer support will always be here for you. After closing, you will receive phone calls letters in the mail of any changes that have taken place. And you have my cell phone you can call me anytime. You’re not just a client… I look forward to having a long-term Referral relationship
Feedback:
The response does a decent job of addressing the concern about customer support after closing. It reassures the prospect with the promise of ongoing communication, and mentioning personal availability adds a touch of warmth. However, it could be improved by elaborating on the types of support available, such as online resources, dedicated support staff, or specific response times. The tone is friendly and appropriate for the mortgage industry, but a bit more detail on the support structure would enhance the value proposition. Also, while the intent of building a long-term relationship is a great approach, it could use a more explicit closing technique to nudge towards securing their trust and commitment. Overall, it was effective but lacking in depth and clarity on support specifics.
5.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I'm feeling overwhelmed by the paperwork and process involved; how can you make it easier?"
Answer:
Ma’am, a lot of our paperwork and process is done electronically now this will save you time and frustration. Also I am here for you if you have any questions or concerns to help you walk through the process at any time. I will be there for you all the way to closing table
Feedback:
The response addresses the objection by highlighting the electronic aspect of the paperwork, which can alleviate some of the customer's concerns about being overwhelmed. However, it lacks depth in exploring the specific pain points the customer may have. While the reassurances of support are good, there could have been a more solution-focused approach by offering to simplify specific parts of the process or asking more questions to discover the client's unique concerns. Overall, the communication is clear, but it misses the opportunity for deeper engagement and value exploration. A few thoughtful questions could have enhanced the collaborative approach. Score: 5/10
6.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I'm worried about my current job stability; how does that affect my mortgage options?"
Answer:
We will put you in a fixed rate mortgage. You don’t have to worry about your payment or changing. Your current job stability. If it’s a concern, let’s get a mortgage payment. That’s comfortable for you. In the event. You have a period of time where you’re looking for another job you can still afford the payments. I recommend putting three months cushion aside, just for emergency purposes. Let’s go ahead and sign this paperwork and get you into your home get you closed
Feedback:
The response attempts to address the prospect's concern about job stability by suggesting a fixed-rate mortgage, which is a good start as it offers security. However, it lacks a clear exploration of the implications of their job stability on mortgage options. The communication is a bit unclear and disjointed, making it hard to follow. Instead of jumping to closing, it would have been more effective to ask questions to further understand the prospect's situation and concerns. This would have shown active listening and a collaborative approach. The mention of putting aside a cushion is good advice, but it feels more like an afterthought rather than part of a comprehensive solution. Overall, while there are some positive elements, the response misses the mark on engagement and solution-focused dialogue. Score: 4/10 for lack of clarity and insufficient exploration of the prospect's needs and concerns.
7.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Is this mortgage going to tie me down too much or can I adjust it if my situation changes?"
Answer:
You have full control to refinance your mortgage at any time if you feel you need to adjust your mortgage payment to balance out any changes Let’s go ahead and sign here and get you closed
Feedback:
The response does address the concern about tying down the prospect, highlighting the ability to refinance as a flexible option. However, the communication lacks empathy and fails to fully engage with the prospect's feelings about commitment. Instead of immediately pushing to close the deal, it would have been more effective to ask a clarifying question to explore the prospect's specific situation and concerns further. This would demonstrate active listening and a more consultative approach. The closing attempt feels premature and could create resistance instead of confidence. Overall, the response needed more curiosity and rapport building to be effective.
8.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I want to be sure I'm making a smart investment; how do I know this mortgage is right for me?"
Answer:
Purchasing a home is the smartest investment you could ever make. You’re walking away with the best rate and the best payment that fits your budget. This is the best Mortgage option for you. Let’s go ahead and sign here and close.
Feedback:
The response does a decent job of affirming the idea that purchasing a home is a smart investment, but it lacks depth in addressing the prospect's specific concern about making a smart investment. There’s no exploration of the prospect's unique financial situation, which is crucial in the mortgage industry. A solution-focused approach should include more personalized insights, like discussing the benefits and potential risks of the mortgage options available. Additionally, the closing technique feels too assumptive and lacks a collaborative tone; instead of pushing for a signature, it would be better to invite further discussion or questions from the prospect. Overall, the response could benefit from a more consultative approach and better demonstration of value. Score: 4/10.
9.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I've heard mixed reviews about your company; how can I trust that this is the right decision?"
Answer:
I’m happy to ease your concerns about our company. Let’s discuss any concerns you have now. Our company has been top 10 for the last three years in a row
Feedback:
The response does a decent job of acknowledging the objection and inviting the prospect to share their specific concerns, which shows some level of active listening. However, it lacks a deeper exploration of the mixed reviews and doesn't provide much in terms of reassurance or value exploration. Simply stating a ranking doesn't address the underlying trust issues. It would be more effective to share a customer success story or testimonials to build credibility and trust. Additionally, asking open-ended questions to uncover the specifics of the prospect's concerns would demonstrate curiosity and a commitment to addressing their needs. Overall, while there's a good start, the response needs to be more comprehensive in addressing the trust issue directly and offering evidence of reliability. Score: 5
10.
3
/ 10
Question:
"I need to discuss this with my spouse before making a commitment; can we have a follow-up conversation?"
Answer:
Absolutely I highly recommend you speaking with your spouse about this commitment. Why don’t you give him a call right now while I start the paperwork?
Feedback:
The response lacks effectiveness in addressing the concern. While it's good to encourage discussion with the spouse, suggesting that the prospect call them immediately while starting paperwork may come across as pushy and does not respect the prospect's need for reflection. This could be perceived as disregarding their autonomy. A more consultative approach could involve suggesting a specific time for a follow-up call after they've had their discussion, reinforcing that you respect their decision-making process. The tone is somewhat dismissive rather than collaborative, which can hinder rapport building. Overall, it misses the mark on active listening and showing curiosity about their situation. Additionally, there's no closing technique employed here, and the response could benefit from exploring the value of your service further. A more effective response would involve acknowledging the need to discuss with their spouse and offering to provide any additional information they might need for that conversation. Overall, this response scores a 3 for not adequately addressing the objection or fostering a collaborative relationship.
Take New IQ Test