Auto
Sales Assessment Results
55
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
You've put in the effort, but let's be honest—your performance is sitting at a lukewarm 5.5. While you occasionally show sparks of understanding, particularly in acknowledging customer concerns, you often fall short when it comes to driving the conversation forward and showcasing your unique value. Your strongest techniques seem to gravitate towards active listening and curiosity, which is great, but without a confident push towards solutions, it’s like a car stuck in neutral.
Patterns are popping up here; you consistently recognize objections but then fail to follow through with strong, tailored responses that address the core of the prospects' needs. You’ve got the empathy down, but it’s time to unleash some assertiveness.
To elevate your game, dive deeper into the Challenger Sale and consultative selling techniques. These will help you not only ask the right questions but also provide the insights that make prospects reconsider their choices. You need to learn how to not just listen but lead the conversation towards a solution that positions you as the expert rather than just another vendor.
Here’s your coaching moment: Remember, confidence isn’t just about what you say but how you say it. Own your expertise. When you communicate with clarity and assurance, you build trust, and when you build trust, you close deals. Don't just be part of the conversation; take charge of it. Push yourself to articulate not just what you offer, but why it matters to them. Let's turn that potential into performance!
Question Breakdown
1.
5
/ 10Question:
"We've had a long-standing relationship with our current vendor, and I'm not sure if switching to a new supplier is worth the risk."
Answer:
Completely understand your hesitation but we’re not sure we can even help you yet. What do you enjoy about your current supplier?
Feedback:
The response demonstrates an understanding of the prospect's hesitation, which is a good start. However, it lacks a strong, proactive approach to addressing their concern about switching suppliers. Instead of opening with uncertainty about whether you can help, it would be more effective to highlight unique value propositions or benefits your company can offer. Asking what they enjoy about their current supplier is a good discovery question, but it could be complemented by exploring areas where they might have unmet needs or frustrations. The tone is appropriate, but a more confident stance could help build trust. Overall, the response could benefit from a clearer focus on the value your services could provide compared to their current vendor, and a better closing technique to guide them toward considering a switch.
Score: 5/10 for acknowledging the prospect's concern but lacking a stronger sales push and clarity in communication.
2.
5
/ 10Question:
"The specifications for the performance metrics you provided seem promising, but how do they compare to our current solution?"
Answer:
Currently we’re only tracking a portion of the metrics. This will allow you to full customize to exactly the metrics to help enhance your teams performance. What would you like the next steps to be?
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the objection but misses the mark on effectively comparing performance metrics. Instead of addressing the comparison with the current solution, it jumps to customization without clarifying how it benefits the prospect over their existing solution. Additionally, the closing question feels abrupt and lacks context. A more effective approach would involve exploring the prospect's current metrics, understanding their pain points, and then clearly demonstrating how your solution not only meets but exceeds their existing capabilities. A tailored response would enhance the collaborative approach and show active listening.
Score: 5
3.
5
/ 10Question:
"What kind of post-purchase support and training can I expect, especially if my team encounters technical issues?"
Answer:
Thats a question we hope gets asked at this point in the process because This company had been found on not only having an opportunity exceptional purchasing experience but what’s more important to us is the ownership experience is even better. With that said We would be available 24/7 with a team that would have the ability to see through any technical issues your organization, Weekly trainings and monthly updates. Would you like your add anymore times to help optimize?
Feedback:
The response does a reasonable job of addressing the customer's concern about post-purchase support and training. It emphasizes the company's commitment to a positive ownership experience, which is crucial in the auto industry. However, the communication lacks clarity and contains grammatical errors, which may confuse the prospect. The closing question about adding more times for training is somewhat awkward and could be rephrased for better engagement. It would have been beneficial to explore the specific technical issues the team might face to tailor the support offered. Overall, while the intent is good, the execution falls short in clarity, curiosity, and professionalism.
4.
7
/ 10Question:
"Our project timeline is quite tight; can you guarantee that your solution will be implemented effectively within our schedule?"
Answer:
The only thing we can guarantee is that our team will work tirelessly to ensure roll out and implementation of our solution within a desired time line. When’s the soonest we would be able to start so we can make sure is done within the designated time line?
Feedback:
The response addresses the concern about the tight project timeline by emphasizing the team's commitment to working hard for timely implementation. However, it lacks a clear assurance or specific strategy to manage that timeline, which could create uncertainty for the prospect. The question at the end shows a proactive approach to move the conversation forward, but it could be improved by including more details on how the team plans to meet the timeline effectively. Overall, the communication is clear, but it could be more solution-focused and demonstrate a better understanding of the prospect's urgency.
To enhance the response, consider discussing any processes or methodologies (like Agile or Lean) that will help ensure timely execution. Also, acknowledging the pressure the client feels could build rapport more effectively.
5.
5
/ 10Question:
"I'm concerned about the total cost of ownership versus our current solution; can you break down the ROI clearly?"
Answer:
Currently you own a vehicle for 3 yrs that would’ve put 20k a year on and took it out for an 84 month term and have 10 negative equity. With the currently lease we are showing you not only would you be able to get out of your negative equity sooner you’d also not be on the hook at the end of this lease for any in equity you have. You turn it in and wipe your hands clean of the vehicle and your negative equity that would’ve paid off in the 39 month lease. At this point how could you afford NOT to do it.
Feedback:
The response does a decent job of addressing the concern about total cost of ownership by highlighting the benefits of the leasing option over the current vehicle ownership. However, it lacks clarity and could confuse the prospect with excessive jargon and numbers without providing a simple breakdown of ROI. The tone could also be more customer-centric rather than assuming that the prospect's current ownership is a burden. Instead of asking 'how could you afford NOT to do it,' a more effective closing technique would be to ask for their thoughts or if they have further questions. The response could benefit from a clearer structure and more empathetic language to ensure better engagement and understanding. Overall, it shows some attempt at solution-focused selling and value exploration, but it needs improvement in communication and tone.
6.
6
/ 10Question:
"Given the current economic climate, I'm hesitant to reallocate budget for a new purchase right now while we have ongoing projects."
Answer:
Completely understand your hesitation. With that being said what would be the cost of not doing it? Where you’d be able to increase productivity and the solution would pay for itself. What would be the first thing you’d do with the solution?
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern about reallocating the budget, which is a good start in terms of active listening and empathy. However, the transition to the question about the cost of not making the purchase could be more smoothly integrated. The response lacks a clear closing technique that would encourage the prospect to consider taking action despite their hesitation. Additionally, while the question about what they would do with the solution is relevant, it seems a bit abrupt and may not fully explore the value proposition of the solution being offered. A more solution-focused approach that emphasizes the benefits and ROI of the new purchase in the context of ongoing projects would strengthen the argument. Overall, the communication is clear, but it could benefit from a more structured value exploration and collaborative approach.
7.
5
/ 10Question:
"How will your solution fit with the existing systems we have in place, and what level of customization is required?"
Answer:
That’s a great question. Let me ask this are you looking for a more customized solution or are you looking for something that seamlessly integrates? We can do as little or more of one or the other.!
Feedback:
The response shows an understanding of the prospect's concern regarding integration and customization, but it lacks depth in addressing the specifics of how the solution can fit with existing systems. The salesperson asks a follow-up question, which is good for curiosity and discovery, but the initial answer should also provide some assurance on integration capabilities. Additionally, the tone could be more confident and professional, as it currently feels a bit vague. Overall, while the approach is collaborative, it needs a clearer roadmap on how to achieve the integration and customization, along with some value exploration.
Score: 5/10
8.
7
/ 10Question:
"I've heard mixed reviews about your company's market reputation; how can you assure me of your reliability?"
Answer:
I can appreciate your hesitation and honesty regatding some of our reviews. We pride ourselves in being transparent and well versed in ensuring we’re there for our clients. Not only have we changed our training schedule but also made sure we have a dedicated account executive who reports directly to our regional director. We have a SOP to ensure accountability so situations don’t arise. In a perfect world, what you the best reliability look like for you?
Feedback:
The response effectively acknowledges the prospect's concern about the company's reputation, showing appreciation for their honesty. It demonstrates transparency and highlights steps taken to improve reliability, such as training and accountability measures. However, the communication could be clearer and more concise, as it gets a bit bogged down in details. The closing question about what reliability looks like for the prospect is a good discovery technique but could be framed more directly to encourage an open dialogue. Overall, it addresses the concern but lacks a strong closing technique to reinforce confidence in the company.
Score: 7
9.
6
/ 10Question:
"There are multiple stakeholders involved in this decision; how will you help us align their diverse interests?"
Answer:
What do you feel like the most common interests are? We should look at meeeting with the stakeholders directly to help isolate each interests.
Feedback:
The response effectively acknowledges the concern about multiple stakeholders by asking about their common interests. This shows curiosity and a willingness to understand their perspective, which is a good start. However, it could be strengthened by providing a clearer strategy or framework for how you plan to facilitate alignment among the stakeholders. Suggesting a direct meeting is a good approach, but elaborating on how you would guide that discussion or offering to help prepare for it would demonstrate a more solution-focused mindset. Overall, the tone is collaborative, but it could benefit from more depth in addressing the objection.
Score: 6
10.
4
/ 10Question:
"I'm not sure if now is the right time for this investment; could you help me understand the urgency in relation to our strategic goals?"
Answer:
What would you say your main strategic goal is? If your goals are to increase sales, minimize turnover over and completely change the way your client thinks, feels, and recommends your business to other in a positive way then no investment would be to be or have wrong timing. If those aren’t things aren’t important to you then we may not be the right company and not sure if we can help.
Feedback:
The response attempts to engage the prospect by asking about their strategic goals, which is a good start for understanding their perspective. However, the phrasing is somewhat unclear and overly complex, making it difficult for the prospect to follow. Instead of directly addressing the urgency of the investment, the response leans towards a confrontational tone by implying that if their goals don’t align, the company may not be suitable for them. This could alienate the prospect rather than foster a collaborative conversation. A more effective approach would involve clearly articulating how the investment aligns with their goals and creating a sense of urgency by highlighting the consequences of delaying the decision. Additionally, the response could benefit from active listening by acknowledging the prospect's concerns more directly before posing the question. Overall, while there are elements of curiosity and discovery, the delivery and clarity need significant improvement.
Score: 4