Buying Houses for Cash
Sales Assessment Results
57
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
Alright, listen up! Your performance in this test was like a rollercoaster—some thrilling highs and some stomach-churning lows. You showcased a decent grasp of empathy and understanding in several responses, especially when addressing concerns about low offers and cash sales. Kudos for that! But let’s be real: your communication often read like a convoluted riddle, leaving prospects scratching their heads instead of getting excited. You missed the mark on closing techniques more often than a toddler misses the toilet. Time for some serious sharpening on active listening, curiosity, and framing questions in a more collaborative tone. Remember, you’re selling solutions, not just words. Get it together, or you’ll be selling ice to Eskimos. Your scores reflect this—average, at best, with a couple of glaring misses! Step it up!
Question Breakdown
1.
4
/ 10Question:
"I need to think it over and discuss this with my family before making a decision."
Answer:
Does your family know you’re talking to me right now? If so, what have they said about selling your house? Would they agree that if you don’t do something about this now then the problems would only keep getting worse?
Feedback:
The response addresses the objection by asking questions to involve the family in the decision-making process, which is good for understanding the prospect's network. However, it seems a bit confrontational and may make the prospect feel defensive. A more empathetic approach that acknowledges their need to discuss with family while offering support could lead to a better connection. The response lacks a closing technique and doesn't explore value or solutions beyond the immediate concern. Asking about the family's thoughts is a good start, but it could have been framed in a more collaborative tone. Overall, it misses an opportunity to build rapport and could benefit from a more solution-focused approach.
2.
6
/ 10Question:
"Your offer is too low compared to what I could get on the market if I wait."
Answer:
Yea that make sense and I understand why you may think that but you expressed concern about having people just coming into your house unannounced. Also when you consider the the amount of money is needed for the repairs and including commissions and closings costs, we’re actually much closer to your walk away amount than you think. We actually serve your immediate need about selling your house fast.
Feedback:
The response effectively acknowledges the prospect's concern about the low offer by showing understanding and empathy. The salesperson references the prospect's previous concern about having people in their home, which demonstrates active listening. However, the communication could be clearer; it feels slightly convoluted and might confuse the prospect. While it attempts to highlight the benefits of selling quickly, it could do a better job of explicitly connecting the offer to the overall value proposition, such as the convenience and speed of the sale. A closing technique is missing here; asking for a follow-up conversation or suggesting next steps would be beneficial. Overall, it shows a decent understanding but lacks a bit of clarity and directness.
3.
6
/ 10Question:
"I'm not in a hurry to sell; why should I take a cash offer now?"
Answer:
I understand you’re not in a hurry but you expressed not wanting people showing up whenever, our process provided and quick and easy sale without multiple people showing up unannounced. How about I show you the pros and cons of both options in our next call?
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by acknowledging the prospect's lack of urgency while emphasizing the benefits of a cash offer, particularly the convenience of avoiding multiple showings. This aligns well with the prospect's desire for privacy. However, it could be improved by asking more open-ended questions to further explore the prospect's situation and needs. The closing technique suggestion for a follow-up call is strong, but it could have been more assertive by proposing a specific time for the call. Overall, the communication is clear and appropriate for the industry, but it lacks deeper engagement and curiosity.
- Effectiveness in addressing the concern: 7/10
- Clear communication with appropriate tone: 8/10
- Closing technique: 6/10
- Solution-focused approach: 7/10
- Curiosity and Discovery: 5/10
- Active Listening: 7/10
- Value Exploration: 7/10
- Collaborative Approach: 6/10
4.
6
/ 10Question:
"I've received higher offers from other cash buyers; why should I go with you?"
Answer:
I think that’s a great idea gathering multiple offers from other companies but keep in mind that price isn’t always means the best deal for you. Remember you told me it was important to you that you worked with someone who you trusted and did honest business with you. Do you think you’ve shifted through all the offers company details and terms? I would be happy to help you sort through your offers and help you even if it means not working with me in going through all them and help you decide which offer is best for you. Would that be helpful?
Feedback:
This response shows a good attempt to address the objection by acknowledging the prospect's need for trust and honesty, which are crucial in the house-buying process. The salesperson effectively pivots the conversation from price to value, emphasizing the importance of working with someone trustworthy. However, the communication could be clearer and more concise, as it feels a bit convoluted at times. The closing technique is present but could be more assertive; instead of asking if it would be helpful, the salesperson could suggest a next step, such as scheduling a time to review the offers together. Additionally, while the response indicates an intent to help, it lacks a deeper exploration of the specific value the salesperson can provide compared to competitors. Overall, the response could benefit from stronger active listening and curiosity about the prospect's specific concerns regarding the competing offers.
Score: 6/10
5.
2
/ 10Question:
"What if my house doesn't sell quickly? How will that impact this cash offer?"
Answer:
How do you mean? Can you clarify what you mean by if the house downer sell quickly? We are buying the house
Feedback:
The response does not effectively address the prospect's concern about the potential delay in selling the house. Instead of seeking clarification, the salesperson should have acknowledged the objection directly and provided reassurance about the cash offer timeline. Effective communication is lacking, and the tone seems a bit dismissive. Additionally, no value exploration, curiosity, or collaborative approach is demonstrated. The response could benefit from a more empathetic understanding of the prospect's worries and a stronger closing technique to reinforce confidence in the cash offer. Overall, the response could have been clearer and more engaging.
6.
7
/ 10Question:
"I'm worried about hidden fees or costs that might come up during the sale process."
Answer:
I definitely understand how you could be concerned about that but I can assure you there are no hidden fees during the sales process. I can review all the paperwork upfront and show you exactly the cost working with us will be.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by acknowledging the prospect's worry and providing reassurance about the absence of hidden fees. However, it could improve in a few ways: 1) It could have included a more detailed breakdown of what to expect in terms of costs, which would enhance clarity and build trust. 2) Asking a follow-up question such as 'What specific fees are you worried about?' would demonstrate curiosity and active listening. 3) The tone is professional, but a touch more warmth could help in building rapport. Overall, it’s a solid response but lacks depth in exploration and discovery.
7.
7
/ 10Question:
"How do I know that your cash offer is legitimate and not just a lowball tactic?"
Answer:
I can definitely understand your concern, I'm curious, has someone else used their offer as a lowball tactic? I can assure you we mean business proven by the numerous 5 star google reviews we have on our company that demonstrate our legitimacy. Let’s jump on google and review them now and work on ways that work for you on ensuring we’re a good fit.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by acknowledging the prospect's feelings and asking a thoughtful question to uncover past experiences, which demonstrates curiosity and discovery. However, it could be improved by providing more concrete evidence of legitimacy beyond Google reviews, such as mentioning a business license, testimonials, or the number of successful transactions. The invitation to check Google reviews is a good start, but it lacks a direct closing technique to guide the prospect toward the next step. The tone is appropriate for the industry, but a bit more reassurance could strengthen the message. Overall, it's a solid attempt but needs more emphasis on value exploration and a clearer call to action.
Score: 7
8.
7
/ 10Question:
"I'm concerned about the timeline; can you close quickly enough for my needs?"
Answer:
I want to make sure I can manage your expectations and needs. What concerns you most about the timeline? We’re very confident when we agree to a timeline we stick to it.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by asking a clarifying question about the prospect's specific worries regarding the timeline. This demonstrates curiosity and shows a willingness to understand the prospect's perspective. However, the response could be improved by providing more assurance of your ability to meet their timeline rather than just stating that you stick to agreed timelines. Adding a specific example of a past successful quick closing could enhance the value exploration. Overall, while the tone is appropriate and the communication is clear, there is a missed opportunity for a closing technique to further engage the prospect.
Score: 7
9.
7
/ 10Question:
"What if my property needs repairs? Will you still buy it for cash?"
Answer:
Definitely! We specialize in houses that need repairs and our offer is based on the major components of the house and have taken those into consideration with our offer. Let’s work on getting the paperwork started now with an offer
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about property repairs by reassuring the prospect that the company specializes in such situations. However, it could benefit from a more empathetic tone to acknowledge the prospect's potential worries about repairs. While the offer to start paperwork shows a desire to move forward, it may come off as a bit too aggressive without first exploring the prospect's specific concerns further. Adding a question to delve deeper into the property's condition would demonstrate active listening and curiosity. Overall, it's a solid response, but it could use a touch more warmth and engagement.
10.
5
/ 10Question:
"I've heard horror stories about cash sales; how do I know this will be different?"
Answer:
I can definitely understand your concern, there are quite a bit of horror out there, but that can be in any business. Could you tell me what specifically have you heard? I ensure you that we have numerous 5 star google reviews and we buy over 100 houses a year and yet to hear anything outrageous. Let’s work on getting the paperwork going
Feedback:
The response shows some understanding of the prospect's concern about cash sales, which is a good start. However, it could have been more effective in addressing the concern by specifically acknowledging the horror stories and differentiating the service offered. While asking about the specific stories is a good move for curiosity and discovery, the transition to paperwork feels a bit rushed without fully addressing the prospect's fears. The mention of reviews is helpful, but it lacks a personal touch or a deeper exploration of how those reviews relate to the prospect's specific concerns. Overall, the tone is okay, but it could be more empathetic rather than just stating facts. A stronger closing technique could have been employed to reassure the prospect before moving to the next step.
Score: 5