Car sales
Sales Assessment Results

44
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
December 22, 2024
Your performance in this test needs serious attention. An average score of 4.4 signals that you're not quite hitting the mark, and it's clear that your approach often falls short in depth and engagement. You show some awareness of customer concerns, but you miss crucial opportunities to explore those concerns further and build rapport. Your responses tend to lack the collaborative tone that fosters trust, and unfortunately, they often come off as dismissive or too quick to push for a close. One consistent pattern is the failure to ask open-ended questions that would allow you to dive deeper into the customer's needs. This is a missed chance to showcase empathy and curiosity, both of which are vital in sales. On the positive side, you have moments where you acknowledge customer concerns, but these need to be followed up with more thorough solutions and a clearer demonstration of value. To improve, I suggest you study SPIN Selling and Solution Selling. The SPIN technique will help you frame questions that uncover deeper insights about your customer's situation and needs, while Solution Selling will teach you how to tailor your responses to address specific pain points effectively. Remember, every conversation is an opportunity to connect. Aim for a more empathetic approach, focusing on truly understanding your customer rather than rushing to close the deal. Your coaching moment? Think of each interaction as a chance to build a relationship, not just a transaction. If you shift your mindset to prioritize connection over closing, you'll see your scores—and your sales—improve.

Question Breakdown

1.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I'm really concerned about how this car will hold its value over time compared to other brands."
Answer:
Comparatively speaking all vehicles depreciate but owning the one you want that has all the features and benefits you desire are key
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the concern about depreciation but lacks depth and does not effectively address the specifics of the objection. It would be more effective to provide data or examples of the car's resale value compared to competitors, and to engage the customer further by asking questions about their priorities in a vehicle. The tone is somewhat dismissive as it doesn't fully empathize with the customer's concern. To improve, consider highlighting the car's unique features that contribute to maintaining value and ask if they have specific brands in mind for comparison. A more collaborative approach could strengthen the rapport. Overall, it feels like an incomplete response that misses the opportunity for a deeper conversation.
2.
3
/ 10
Question:
"I want to make sure that the financing options are flexible enough to fit my budget; can you help with that?"
Answer:
Absolutely, we have multiple options on a for you to choose from
Feedback:
The response lacks depth and does not effectively address the prospect's concern about flexible financing options. While acknowledging the availability of options is a start, it misses out on providing specific details or reassurance about how those options can cater to the customer's budget. Additionally, there are no questions asked to further understand the prospect's specific needs or financial situation. This approach could benefit from a more solution-focused dialogue, demonstrating curiosity about their budget and offering tailored solutions. Overall, the tone is friendly, but it lacks the collaborative approach needed to build trust and rapport in a car sales context.
3.
3
/ 10
Question:
"I need to discuss this with my partner first; they have a lot of say in our big purchases like this."
Answer:
Have you discussed with them prior to coming here today? Why don’t you take the car and show them the proposal I gave you
Feedback:
The response lacks effectiveness in addressing the customer's concern about needing to consult their partner. Instead of exploring the situation further or acknowledging the importance of their partner's opinion, it jumps to suggesting they take the car, which may come off as pushy. A more effective approach would have involved asking open-ended questions to understand their partner's role better and suggesting a joint discussion or a follow-up meeting. The communication tone could also be softer and more collaborative. Overall, the response misses an opportunity to build rapport and trust with the customer, and there is no clear closing technique used. Additionally, the response does not demonstrate curiosity about the customer's needs or the implications of their partner's decision. Score: 3
4.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I’ve heard that some models in this price range have significant maintenance issues; how does yours compare?"
Answer:
Maintaining your vehicle is important and our vehicles are very low maintenance with 18k oil change intervals
Feedback:
The response addresses the concern about maintenance issues but lacks depth. While it correctly points out a key advantage (18k oil change intervals), it doesn't directly compare to competitor models or provide data to back up the claim. Additionally, there’s no engagement with the prospect’s concern about significant maintenance issues, which could have been an opportunity to explore further and build trust. A more effective response would involve asking questions to uncover specific concerns the prospect has, possibly using the SPIN Selling technique to delve deeper into their worries. Overall, the response is somewhat effective but misses an opportunity for collaboration and deeper exploration of value. Score: 5.
5.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Honestly, I'm not feeling a sense of urgency to make a decision right now, especially with so many options available."
Answer:
I understand that, while there are endless options to choose from let’s narrow down what’s important to you so we can find a vehicle that fits your wants/needs and budget
Feedback:
The response shows a decent understanding of the customer's perspective by acknowledging their lack of urgency and the multitude of options available. However, it lacks a sense of urgency or compelling reason to encourage quicker decision-making. A better approach could have included asking questions to understand the customer's specific preferences and concerns (curiosity and discovery) and perhaps offering insights on market trends or limited-time offers to create urgency. Overall, it's a solid start but could benefit from a stronger closing technique and more active engagement. Score: 5/10
6.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I'm worried about whether the support and warranty you offer will be sufficient in case something goes wrong after the purchase."
Answer:
Our warranty is comprehensive and if you need additional time or mileage we can accommodate that for you as well
Feedback:
The response addresses the concern about support and warranty but lacks depth and reassurance that a car buyer would typically seek. It could benefit from providing specific details about what the warranty covers, how long it lasts, and examples of customer satisfaction regarding support. Additionally, it would be helpful to ask the customer if they have any specific scenarios in mind that they are worried about, demonstrating curiosity and active listening. A more collaborative approach would help build rapport and trust. Overall, it’s a step in the right direction but needs more substance and engagement to truly reassure the prospect.
7.
6
/ 10
Question:
"I've been looking at alternatives from competitors because I need to weigh all my options carefully."
Answer:
It’s important to know what your options are, what have you researched thus far and what brought you to my dealership today?
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the objection by inviting the customer to share their research and reasoning, which shows curiosity and opens a dialogue. However, it could benefit from a clearer value proposition to highlight why your dealership stands out from the competition. Additionally, a more collaborative tone could help build rapport. Consider asking follow-up questions that explore the customer's specific needs and pain points to guide them toward a solution. Overall, it's a good start but needs more depth in showcasing value and building a connection.
8.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I’m just not convinced that the features justify the price when I can find similar cars at lower cost elsewhere."
Answer:
There’s always a “cheaper” option but you came here because you like our product. Why would you buy something you don’t like simply because it’s cheaper?
Feedback:
The response does address the objection by pointing out that the prospect has a preference for the product, but it lacks depth and fails to explore the prospect's specific concerns about the features and pricing. It doesn't engage the prospect in a discussion about what features they value or why they believe the price is unjustified. A more effective approach would have included asking questions to understand their perspective better and highlighting the unique value of the car being sold, possibly using a solution-focused selling technique. The tone is somewhat dismissive, which might not be received well in the car sales industry where rapport and understanding are crucial. A more empathetic response could build a stronger connection. Overall, the response does not fully engage the prospect or effectively demonstrate value, leading to a lower score.
9.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Can you assure me that your dealership will provide excellent post-purchase support and service? I’ve had issues in the past with other places."
Answer:
We offer complete concierge service before, during and after the sale.
Feedback:
While your response mentions a concierge service, it lacks depth in addressing the prospect's specific concern about post-purchase support. You could enhance your response by providing examples of the services included in the concierge package, such as maintenance reminders, dedicated customer support, or any warranties. Additionally, asking a follow-up question to understand their past experiences better would show active listening and build rapport. Aim to create a sense of trust by providing more details that demonstrate your commitment to excellent service. Overall, the response is brief and could benefit from more engagement. Score: 5
10.
4
/ 10
Question:
"With my current job situation being uncertain, I’m hesitant to commit to a new car right now."
Answer:
I understand that, is your new job paying less than your previous? I am happy to help you find something you love that is within your budget
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern, which is a good start, but it misses the mark in several areas. First, it could be improved by showing empathy and understanding rather than jumping straight to a question about the potential pay cut. Instead, the salesperson should explore the broader implications of the prospect's job uncertainty and how that affects their needs for a vehicle. Additionally, while offering to help find something within their budget is a positive approach, it lacks a strong closing technique or a clear invitation to continue the conversation. Overall, the response could benefit from more curiosity and discovery, as well as a stronger emphasis on value exploration in relation to the prospect's current situation. The tone is neutral, but it could be warmer to foster rapport. Score: 4/10 for not fully addressing the emotional aspect of the objection and lacking in collaborative engagement.
Take New IQ Test