Real Estate
Sales Assessment Results by Ekele Blessing

40
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
June 18, 2026
Let's not sugarcoat it; your performance is below average, and it's time to get serious about improving. You’ve shown some flashes of understanding by acknowledging prospects' concerns, which is a good start, but your responses often lack the depth and specificity that truly engage and persuade. You need to dig deeper into the details—provide data, examples, and a clear value proposition that showcases how your offerings outshine the competition. The pattern of giving surface-level answers while missing opportunities to ask follow-up questions is concerning. You need to elevate your consultative approach by understanding and addressing your prospects' unique needs and concerns with more tailored responses. To push your skills further, I suggest you dive into Solution Selling and the AIDA Model. These techniques will help you frame your conversations in a way that not only identifies pain points but also guides prospects through a compelling narrative of attention, interest, desire, and action. Remember, selling is not just about answering questions; it's about engaging in a dialogue that positions you as a trusted advisor. Take this as your coaching moment: every conversation is an opportunity to build a relationship where you can showcase your expertise. Don't just answer; connect, engage, and elevate your prospects' perspectives. It's time to step up your game.

Question Breakdown

1.
3
/ 10
Question:
"I'm concerned about the ROI on this property; can you explain how it will outperform similar investments in the current market?"
Answer:
I understand your concern and my goal is to ensure you're not just buying property but making a smart investment decision that deliver real value and profit
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern, which is a good start. However, it lacks specificity and doesn't provide a clear explanation of how the property will outperform similar investments. To improve, include data or examples of comparable properties and their ROI. Additionally, using a solution-focused approach by outlining specific benefits or value propositions related to ROI would enhance the response. Consider asking follow-up questions to further engage the prospect and uncover deeper insights into their expectations.
2.
5
/ 10
Question:
"We have a lot of ongoing projects right now; how much time will my team need to allocate for this purchase?"
Answer:
A few days for evaluation and selection, followed by a short period for approval and documentation. I ensure the process is well documented so it doesn't slow down your other projects
Feedback:
The response provides a timeframe for evaluation and selection, which is helpful. However, it lacks detail regarding how you will minimize disruption to the team's current workload and what specific support you will offer during this process. It would also be beneficial to frame the response in a way that emphasizes the value of the investment and the efficiency of the process. Asking follow-up questions to better understand their current projects and constraints would enhance engagement and demonstrate active listening.
3.
4
/ 10
Question:
"Our board is focused on budget constraints this quarter; what can you offer that justifies the expense?"
Answer:
I would offer investment options within your budget that still deliver strong ROI
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the budget constraints and attempts to offer solutions by mentioning investment options that align with the budget. However, it lacks depth in explaining how these options specifically justify the expense. Providing examples or details on how these options can deliver strong ROI would strengthen the argument. Additionally, asking questions to understand the board's specific budget limits and priorities would demonstrate a more consultative approach and better engage the prospect. Overall, the response needs to be more comprehensive and tailored to address the board's concerns effectively.
4.
4
/ 10
Question:
"With the current economic climate, I'm worried about the long-term value of this investment; can you address that?"
Answer:
I understand your concern but the goal is to ensure you're not just buying for today but securing an asset that contributes to grow
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the prospect's concern, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks depth and specificity in addressing the worry about long-term value in the current economic climate. It would be beneficial to provide data, market trends, or examples of properties that have maintained or increased their value over time, especially during economic downturns. Additionally, incorporating a solution-focused approach by discussing how this investment could be resilient or profitable in the long run would enhance the response. Asking a follow-up question to explore the prospect's specific concerns further could also improve engagement and demonstrate active listening.
5.
4
/ 10
Question:
"This property seems great, but how does it align with our overall long-term company vision?"
Answer:
It provides potentials for steady return and asset security
Feedback:
The response attempts to address the prospect's concern about alignment with their long-term company vision by mentioning steady returns and asset security. However, it lacks a direct connection to the prospect's specific vision or strategic goals. To improve, you should ask clarifying questions to better understand their vision and then articulate how this property aligns with that vision in terms of financial performance, growth potential, and strategic fit. Providing examples of similar situations where the property has contributed to long-term goals could strengthen your response significantly.
6.
5
/ 10
Question:
"There are multiple stakeholders involved in this decision; how can you assist in getting their buy-in?"
Answer:
I would highlight the ROI, risk and long term value in simple terms so every decision maker can easily understand
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the presence of multiple stakeholders, which is a good start. However, it lacks specificity in describing how you would tailor your communication to each stakeholder's unique interests and concerns. Instead of just stating you would highlight ROI, risk, and long-term value, consider explaining how you would approach each stakeholder differently based on their role in the decision-making process. Incorporating a collaborative approach by suggesting strategies for engaging these stakeholders or offering to facilitate discussions could also strengthen your response. Additionally, asking a follow-up question to understand more about the stakeholders involved would demonstrate curiosity and active listening.
7.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I've heard mixed reviews about your technical support; how can you assure me we won't face implementation challenges?"
Answer:
I would ensure that only experienced professionals handle every stahe of the transactions
Feedback:
The response acknowledges the concern about technical support and implementation challenges, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks detail and specific assurances that would address the mixed reviews the prospect has heard. To strengthen your response, you should explain how your team’s experience translates to smoother implementations and highlight any support structures in place, such as training, ongoing assistance, or a dedicated support team. Additionally, consider inviting the prospect to ask further questions or share specific concerns about the reviews they've encountered, which would demonstrate active listening and foster a more collaborative conversation.
8.
5
/ 10
Question:
"This luxury property is appealing, but what hidden costs should I be aware of that could affect my budget?"
Answer:
Legal fees, documentation and registration charges, property tax and maintainance fees
Feedback:
The response identifies several potential hidden costs associated with the property, which is essential in addressing the prospect's concern. However, it lacks depth and context regarding each cost, such as explaining why these fees are necessary or how they can vary over time. To strengthen the response, consider elaborating on how these costs are typically managed or mitigated and emphasize transparency in your dealings. Additionally, inviting the prospect to discuss any specific concerns they might have about these costs would demonstrate active listening and curiosity, fostering a more collaborative conversation.
9.
1
/ 10
Question:
"I need to ensure compliance with local regulations before moving forward; can you provide documentation to support this?"
Answer:
Yes
Feedback:
The response is extremely limited, simply stating 'Yes' without any elaboration or context. It fails to address the prospect's concern for compliance with local regulations effectively. To improve, you should clearly articulate what specific documentation you can provide, explain how it ensures compliance, and potentially invite the prospect to discuss any specific regulations they are concerned about. This approach would demonstrate active listening and a consultative style that is important in real estate transactions.
10.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Market positioning is crucial; how does this property stand against competitors in both value and potential appreciation?"
Answer:
Because of it location advantage, strong long term appreciation potential
Feedback:
The response mentions location advantages and strong long-term appreciation potential, which are important points. However, it lacks specificity and depth in comparing the property to competitors. To improve, provide specific examples of how this property's location contributes to its value compared to similar properties in the area. Additionally, discussing any market trends or data that support the appreciation potential would further strengthen your argument. Engaging the prospect by asking about their specific priorities in market positioning could also enhance the conversation.
Take New IQ Test