real estate
Sales Assessment Results
63
Developing Closer
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
Alright, let's break this down. You've got some solid knowledge, but your execution is about as warm as a polar bear's hug. You addressed concerns well but missed the mark on empathy and engagement—think of your prospects as human beings, not just checkbooks. Your scores range from decent to 'meh,' with an average around 6, which is passable but not stellar. You need to amp up your active listening and curiosity—ask more questions and actually listen to the answers. You’re providing solutions, sure, but it's like offering a lifeboat without acknowledging the storm. Get personal, get curious, and for heaven's sake, close the deal! Otherwise, you might just find yourself talking to walls instead of clients.
Question Breakdown
1.
6
/ 10Question:
"The market seems too volatile right now; I'm not sure if this is the right time to invest."
Answer:
Right now is actually a great time, due to the higher interest rates people are hesitant to buy at the moment. That being said you can take advantage of the lack of competition and find the home you want, then you can just refinance when rates drop.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about market volatility by highlighting the advantages of low competition and the potential for refinancing. However, it could benefit from a more empathetic tone acknowledging the prospect's hesitation about investing in a volatile market. Additionally, it lacks a closing technique to prompt further discussion or a clear next step. Asking questions to assess the prospect's specific concerns or financial situation would have shown better curiosity and active listening. Overall, while it presents a solution-focused approach, it misses an opportunity to build rapport and engage the prospect more personally.
2.
7
/ 10Question:
"I've seen similar properties listed for a lower price; why is yours priced so high?"
Answer:
We feel that the updates and the craftsmanship in our home far exceeds those of similar properties. If you are comparing apples to apples that is one thing, but in our case this property truly outshines the others that are similar in size, but they are not similar in quality and we believe that the price of ours shows that.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by highlighting the quality and craftsmanship of the property compared to similar listings. However, it could be improved by inviting the prospect to share more about the properties they are considering, which would demonstrate active listening and curiosity. The tone is appropriate for real estate, but adding a question or two could enhance the collaborative approach. Additionally, while the value exploration is evident, it could be made stronger by providing specific examples or features that justify the higher price. Overall, it’s a solid response but lacks some engagement and discovery elements.
3.
4
/ 10Question:
"We're concerned about the neighborhood's safety; how can you assure us it's a good area?"
Answer:
I encourage you to check online for crime reports, I believe that will settle your nerves on your concerns. This neighborhood has great deal of street lighting throughout which should also ease your concerns. After speaking with other owners they insured us that this is a family friendly and safe neighborhood.
Feedback:
The response does address the concern about neighborhood safety, but it lacks a proactive approach. Instead of encouraging the prospect to look up crime reports online, you could have taken the initiative to provide specific statistics or personal anecdotes that directly relate to safety in the neighborhood. Additionally, while mentioning street lighting is a start, it would be beneficial to elaborate on community initiatives, presence of local law enforcement, or even testimonials from families living in the area. Also, using phrases like 'I believe' can come off as uncertain; instead, aim for more assertive language. Finally, consider asking if they have specific safety concerns or what their criteria for safety are, which would show curiosity and a solution-focused approach. Overall, the response lacks a collaborative tone and could better demonstrate value to the prospect.
4.
7
/ 10Question:
"We've been told that interest rates are expected to rise; should we wait before making a decision?"
Answer:
Well if interest rates are going to rise, it would be in your best interest to make a decision quickly so that you can take advantage of the lower interest rates we are seeing right now before they do go up. I would be happy to help you get set up with a great lender so that they can walk you through the process and lock in that better rate for you today.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about rising interest rates by highlighting the urgency of acting quickly to secure a lower rate. The communication is clear and maintains a positive tone suitable for the real estate industry. However, it lacks a closing technique that would encourage the prospect to take the next step. While it does offer a solution by suggesting they work with a lender, it could benefit from a more collaborative approach by asking questions to better understand the prospect's situation. Overall, it touches on value exploration by emphasizing the benefit of acting now, but doesn't delve into the specifics of how this decision can positively impact their financial future or their overall goals. Active listening could improve by acknowledging their concerns more directly. Score: 7.
5.
6
/ 10Question:
"I'm not convinced that this property will appreciate in value over time; what do you think?"
Answer:
Based on the information I have here from the neighborhood it shows that over the last 10 years property values have more than doubled and they continue to rise year after year. The numbers don't lie, there seems to be a high demand for this neighborhood and I think buying this property would be a smart investment based on the data I have provided.
Feedback:
The salesperson effectively addresses the concern by providing historical data on property appreciation, which supports their claim. However, the response lacks a more nuanced understanding of the prospect's perspective—such as asking about their specific concerns or future plans, which could have demonstrated curiosity and active listening. The tone is factual but could be more engaging to build rapport. Additionally, there is no clear closing technique or invitation for further discussion, which could help in moving the conversation forward. Overall, it's a solid start but could benefit from a more collaborative approach and exploration of the prospect's values and needs.
6.
7
/ 10Question:
"There are several other listings that seem like better deals; how do you justify this investment?"
Answer:
I think that this is going to come down to your future plans and what you are looking for specifically. I think that this property meets all of your wants and needs and is newer than the other properties that are "better deals". If this is going to be your home for the next 5 to 7 years I believe that its value will increase more than the others that will need work done before it is time for you to sell.
Feedback:
The response addresses the objection by attempting to refocus the conversation on the prospect's long-term goals, which is a good strategy in real estate. However, it could be strengthened by providing specific comparisons to the other listings in terms of value, amenities, and potential return on investment. Clear communication is present, and the tone is appropriate for the real estate industry, but the closing technique could be more assertive by inviting the prospect to discuss their future plans in detail. Asking questions to further understand the prospect's perspective and decision-making criteria could enhance curiosity and discovery. Overall, while the response shows some active listening and value exploration, it could benefit from a more collaborative approach and deeper engagement on the specifics of the listings in question.
7.
7
/ 10Question:
"I need to consult with my partner before moving forward; can you give me more time?"
Answer:
I am happy to give you more time, I totally understand having to talk over such a big decision, however, I cannot guarantee that the property will still be available. We have multiple other showings scheduled with offers already coming in. Could you possibly call your wife and I would be happy to go over all of the details with her to help you both make a decision together on this before it is gone.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the prospect's concern about needing more time by acknowledging the importance of discussing significant decisions with their partner. However, the phrasing could be improved for clarity and empathy. Instead of stating 'I cannot guarantee that the property will still be available,' it might be more effective to express urgency in a more collaborative manner, such as suggesting a specific timeframe for a follow-up or offering to facilitate the discussion with the partner. This would enhance the collaborative approach and demonstrate active listening. Additionally, while the suggestion to call their wife is proactive, it could come off as a little pushy; a softer approach might encourage a better response. Overall, the tone is appropriate for real estate, but a bit more warmth and understanding could improve rapport.
Score: 7
8.
7
/ 10Question:
"What happens if we find a major issue with the property after closing?"
Answer:
That is why we will schedule an inspection with a reputable company. They will thoroughly go through the property and in their report they will show us the good the bad and the ugly. Any potential issues that come up from the report we can then amend in the the contract that the sellers fix these issues before our closing date. I hope this strategy eases your worries that we can insure no major issues come up after closing.
Feedback:
This response effectively addresses the concern by highlighting the importance of a thorough inspection and the ability to negotiate repairs before closing. The tone is professional and reassuring, which is appropriate for the real estate industry. However, it could enhance communication by explicitly acknowledging the prospect's fear regarding unexpected issues, showing more empathy. The closing technique is somewhat implicit; a direct invitation to discuss any further concerns or questions could strengthen the engagement. Asking if the prospect has any specific worries about the property inspection would demonstrate curiosity and further build rapport. Overall, the response does provide a solution-focused approach, but it lacks a bit in active listening and exploration of the prospect's specific concerns.
9.
7
/ 10Question:
"We're not sure we can afford the ongoing maintenance costs; can you break that down for us?"
Answer:
Yeah of course, so based on homes in the area that are a similar size the average spending per year for maintenance is around $800 a year. However, for all of my clients that buy a home with me I purchase a one year home warranty for you so that the maintenance does not have to be a worry for you the first year in your home.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about ongoing maintenance costs by providing a specific average figure, which adds credibility. Offering a one-year home warranty demonstrates a solution-focused approach and helps alleviate the prospect's worries about initial maintenance expenses. However, the tone could be more empathetic; acknowledging the concern about affordability more directly would strengthen the connection. It would also be beneficial to ask a follow-up question to discover any specific worries about maintenance costs or to explore their budget further. Overall, the response is clear but could improve in engagement and curiosity.
10.
5
/ 10Question:
"I think we might want to rent rather than buy right now; what are the benefits of purchasing?"
Answer:
With renting you are paying off someone else's mortgage, while renting costs may be lower, the benefits of home ownership outweigh the savings. With purchasing you are not only getting tax benefits but also building wealth. In a couple of years you could have built up enough equity to take out of your home and use to purchase your own rental property! Effectively creating a source of income just from owning your own home.
Feedback:
The response does a decent job of addressing the concern about renting versus buying, highlighting the benefits of home ownership. However, it could improve in several areas:
1. **Effectiveness in Addressing the Concern**: It points out the downsides of renting but could better empathize with the prospect's current situation and motivations for considering renting. Acknowledging their feelings would enhance the effectiveness.
2. **Clear Communication**: The tone is informative but could be warmer and more engaging to build rapport. A conversational tone would make the prospect feel more at ease.
3. **Closing Technique**: There’s no clear closing technique or a call to action to continue the conversation. A question to invite further discussion could help steer the dialogue.
4. **Solution-Focused Approach**: While it does present benefits, it could delve deeper into specific scenarios or personal situations that might relate to the prospect's needs and desires.
5. **Curiosity and Discovery**: The response lacks follow-up questions to understand the prospect's reasons for considering renting over buying. Asking about their financial goals or lifestyle preferences could provide valuable context.
6. **Active Listening**: There’s no acknowledgment of the prospect’s concerns or motivations, which can make the response feel a bit one-sided. Reflecting on their statement would show better understanding.
7. **Value Exploration**: The idea of building equity and tax benefits is good, but it could include more tailored examples to resonate with the prospect's specific situation.
8. **Collaborative Approach**: The response feels somewhat transactional and could benefit from a more collaborative tone, inviting the prospect into a dialogue rather than just presenting information.
Overall, while the response provides some valuable points, it would greatly benefit from a more personalized and engaging approach. Score: 5