Venetian Plaster
Sales Assessment Results

55
Needs Improvement
10 questions
Maximum score: 100
Completed in
December 12, 2024
Well, well, well—looks like you stumbled through this test like a toddler in a candy store. Your scores are all over the place, averaging a mediocre 5.2. You showed some glimmers of potential, especially when you addressed health benefits and collaborative approaches, but then you promptly dropped the ball by failing to engage prospects properly. Let’s be real: your responses were like a flat soda—lacking fizz and flavor. You need to dig deeper into the prospect's concerns and pack your pitches with value. Remember, a good salesperson doesn’t just answer objections; they connect, explore, and close the deal! So, step it up, buttercup—this is sales, not a walk in the park!

Question Breakdown

1.
4
/ 10
Question:
"I've heard that Venetian Plaster requires a lot of maintenance; how do you address that concern?"
Answer:
There is not a lot of maintenance only need to apply new sealer every few years
Feedback:
The response touches on maintenance, but it lacks a deeper exploration of the prospect's concern. It would be more effective to acknowledge the objection more empathetically, perhaps by recognizing that maintenance can be a concern for many homeowners. Additionally, offering a specific example or benefits of using Venetian plaster—like its durability or aesthetic appeal—could enhance the value proposition. It would also be beneficial to ask questions to further understand the prospect's specific worries about maintenance. Overall, the response is brief and misses an opportunity for engagement and rapport building.
2.
6
/ 10
Question:
"Your price is significantly higher than traditional paint; can you justify the cost?"
Answer:
The benefits from traditional lime plaster versus paint is much healthier. Lime plaster does not allow any mold growth, cleans the air you breathe, and also absorbs moisture and releases slowly
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about price by highlighting the health benefits of lime plaster compared to traditional paint, which is a positive start. However, it could be improved by providing a more direct justification of the cost in relation to these benefits—perhaps by quantifying potential long-term savings or durability. The communication is clear and appropriate for the industry, but it lacks a closing technique to guide the prospect towards a decision. Additionally, it does not ask any follow-up questions to further understand the prospect's needs or to engage them in a dialogue about their preferences. Overall, it shows value exploration but could enhance the collaborative approach and curiosity aspects.
3.
4
/ 10
Question:
"We're currently happy with our existing wall finishes, so why should we switch to Venetian Plaster?"
Answer:
To give you something that your visitors will be wowed when they come over to visit. Plus all the health benefits I mentioned previously
Feedback:
The response does attempt to address the prospect's satisfaction with their current wall finishes by focusing on the wow factor for visitors, which is a good angle. However, it lacks depth in exploring the unique features and benefits of Venetian plaster compared to existing options. There's no clear communication of why Venetian plaster is a superior choice or how it can enhance the current aesthetic or functionality of their space. Additionally, the mention of health benefits is vague and not backed up with specifics, making it less persuasive. No thoughtful questions were asked to further understand the prospect's needs or preferences, and there’s no closing technique employed to encourage further discussion or a commitment. Overall, this response lacks a collaborative approach and fails to fully engage the prospect in a meaningful way.
4.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Can this product withstand humidity and moisture in our coastal environment?"
Answer:
Yes, Venetian plaster can withstand humidity and moisture with the proper sealer and maintenance of that sealer.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern about humidity and moisture by affirming the product's capability with the right maintenance. However, it lacks depth in exploration of potential solutions and doesn't delve into why the sealer is important or how often maintenance should occur, which could instill confidence in the prospect. The tone is straightforward but could benefit from a more engaging approach that builds rapport. There is no closing technique or follow-up questions to further understand the prospect's situation, which would have demonstrated active listening. Overall, the response is informative but could be more solution-focused and engaging. Score: 5
5.
7
/ 10
Question:
"We have a limited budget for renovations this year; can you work with us on the price?"
Answer:
Let’s talk about what that budget is, then we can figure how much area we can get a beautiful Venetian plaster finish on.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by inviting the prospect to discuss their budget, demonstrating a willingness to collaborate and find a solution that works for both parties. The tone is appropriate, showing understanding and flexibility. However, it lacks a stronger closing technique or an exploration of the value of the Venetian plaster to justify potential costs. Asking follow-up questions about the prospect's specific needs and aesthetics could enhance the discovery process. Overall, it's a good start, but there’s room for improvement in exploring value and closing.
6.
5
/ 10
Question:
"I’ve seen similar products at a lower price; how do you differentiate your Venetian Plaster?"
Answer:
All our products we use are imported from Italy and therefore would be a superior product compared to some out on that market that are acrylic hybrids
Feedback:
The response does address the concern by highlighting the importation of materials from Italy, which implies a higher quality. However, it lacks depth in differentiating beyond just the source of the materials. It would benefit from more detail on the specific advantages of using imported Venetian plaster, such as durability, finish, or application techniques, which could strengthen the value proposition. Additionally, the response could have included a closing technique, such as inviting the prospect to see a comparison or discussing a unique feature of the product. No questions were posed to further explore the prospect's needs or concerns, which misses an opportunity for engagement. Overall, while the response is somewhat effective, it doesn't fully leverage the opportunity for value exploration or collaborative dialogue.
7.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Our project timeline is tight, and I’m worried about the installation process. How long does it really take?"
Answer:
Depending on amount of wall area we agree on plastering. Can vary from 6-10 days for plastering, curing, and sealing.
Feedback:
The response provides a general timeframe for the project, which addresses the concern about the installation process. However, it lacks specificity regarding how you can help make the timeline work for the prospect. The tone is somewhat neutral, which may not fully engage the prospect's emotions or concerns. It would be beneficial to ask questions to understand their timeline better and explore ways to expedite the process or reassure them of your commitment to meeting their deadlines. Additionally, incorporating a solution-focused approach by mentioning any past experiences or successful projects with tight timelines could enhance credibility and build rapport. Overall, the response needs more warmth and engagement to fully address the prospect's anxiety about the installation timing.
8.
5
/ 10
Question:
"Is it possible to achieve the same aesthetic with a less expensive alternative?"
Answer:
There is the possibility to achieve a similar aesthetic from a distance. Lime wash could give a similar mottled appearance but does not have the smooth soft feel of Venetian plaster as you have the texture of brush strokes in the lime wash.
Feedback:
The response does a fair job of addressing the concern by acknowledging that a similar aesthetic can be achieved with lime wash, but it lacks depth in exploring the unique qualities of Venetian plaster. The communication is clear and relevant to the industry, but it could benefit from a more solution-focused approach by emphasizing the value and benefits of Venetian plaster over alternatives. Additionally, it doesn't ask any follow-up questions to further understand the prospect's needs or preferences, which is critical for building rapport and demonstrating active listening. To strengthen the response, it could include a closing technique, such as inviting the prospect to see samples or discussing a project together. Overall, while there's an attempt to address the objection, a more engaging and collaborative approach is needed. Score: 5
9.
7
/ 10
Question:
"What kind of warranty or guarantee do you offer on your Venetian Plaster?"
Answer:
We offer a 1 year labor warranty and provide a 5-10 year material warranty depending on brand of product used and warranty provided from manufacturer
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the objection by clearly outlining the warranty details, which is crucial in the Venetian plaster industry where quality assurance is important. However, it could benefit from a more engaging tone to foster a connection with the prospect, perhaps by expressing enthusiasm about the product or mentioning how the warranty reflects the confidence in the quality of the workmanship. A closing technique could also have been introduced, such as asking if they have any specific concerns regarding the warranty or if they would like to see samples of the materials covered. Overall, clear communication is present, but the response lacks warmth and a collaborative approach, which could help in building rapport. Score: 7
10.
7
/ 10
Question:
"Our decision-making process involves multiple stakeholders; how can you help us get everyone on board?"
Answer:
Let’s get everyone together so we can look at samples so they can touch and feel. Then I can go through the options and explain all the great benefits traditional lime plasters provide.
Feedback:
The response effectively addresses the concern by suggesting a collaborative approach of bringing stakeholders together, which aligns well with the nature of decision-making in the Venetian plaster industry. Clear communication is present, and the tone is appropriate for engaging multiple stakeholders. However, the response could benefit from a more structured closing technique, such as proposing a specific next step or timeline for the meeting. Additionally, asking questions to uncover specific concerns or interests of the stakeholders could enhance the discovery process and demonstrate active listening. Overall, the value exploration of traditional lime plasters is a good touch, but elaborating on the unique benefits that may appeal to different stakeholders could strengthen the response further. Score: 7/10.
Take New IQ Test